Forget about the
diversion manoeuvres employed by the regime, the big question now is what will
give for the country to finally conduct the elusive political dialogue?
Pictures: (Left)The
entrance of the burnt public library in Nhlangano a town located in the south
of eSwatini, and (Right) a retail complex in a village called Luyengo in
central part of eSwatini in the aftermath of the June 2021 protests.(pic
credit, the author)
A few weeks ago, on the 29th June 2022 eSwatini
came to a complete standstill as citizens adhered to calls from the
pro-democracy movement to observe a one day stay away in commemoration of what
they call the brutal killing of activists on the similar date a year previous,
the 29th June 2021. The stay away call was of course opposed by the eSwatini government,
who instead mobilised the public to continue with their usual activities just
like any other day.
The success of the stay away, acknowledged by the
state daily newspaper the eSwatini Observer with the headline on 30th
June “The Public Stays Away” , came
in as a definite boost to the prodemocracy movement in their navigation of what seems like a complex journey
towards making eSwatini achieve a democratic political dispensation. This may
have been a long standing call but it gained momentum around May 2021 when
protests, calling for justice for a University of eSwatini student called
Thabani Nkomonye who was feared killed by police.
By June 2021 the #JusticeforThabani movement had transformed
into an all-out popular movement seeking the democratisation of eSwatini. Protests
had spread countrywide and sought to cover all the electoral constituencies, petitioning
Members of Parliament (MPs) to amend the constitution. The government reacted
by issuing an order banning the delivery of petitions on 22 June 2021, a move
defied by the protesters and to which government then reacted with brute force.
On the 29th June the country descended
into an unprecedented civil unrest, which many commentators are wont to say brought
eSwatini to the treacherous verge of a civil war. In that period free movement
was curtailed, roads were empty albeit occupied by protesters burning tyres and
logs at intervals, intermittent internet shutdown were effected by the
government, shops were closed and the state was nowhere in sight to maintain
law and order.
In the aftermath more than eighty (80) people were
killed by the state with over two hundred injured and arrested. Financial
losses, particularly to the retail sector as well as public infrastructure, ran
up to an estimated $150 Million. A few weeks later three MPs were charged with inciting
violence and terrorism, two of them Mduduzi Mabuza and Mthandeni Dube were
arrested, denied bail and are still battling, defending those charges in the
high court of eSwatini. The third, Mduduzi Simelane, escaped to exile in South
Africa and has since established a political party called the Swaziland
Liberation Movement (SWALIMO).
The global community made up of civil society
organisations, governments and intergovernmental agencies expressed concern, outrage
and condemnation on the deteriorating state of affair in the country.
Institutions such as the United Nations (UN), the African Union (AU) the
Southern African Development Community (SADC), the European Union (EU) all
issued strongly worded statements on the crisis, all calling for political
dialogue to end the impasse. The USA took unprecedented measures to beef up
security at its properties by importing a battalion of USA Marines into
eSwatini and many countries issued travels advisories to their citizens.
The eSwatini state, responding to international
pressure, acceded and publicly committed to political dialogue. However, from
the onset, the eSwatini government displayed gross intransigence regarding the
implementation of the political dialogue. Without even holding any discussion
with the pro-democracy movement they announced that they would utilise section
232 of the eSwatini constitution which envisages an Annual General Meeting
(Sibaya in native Siswati language) of the Swazi nation. This meeting is open
to all adult eSwatini citizens and is chaired by the King.
Whereas the local prodemocracy movement as well as
a vast majority of international community players had envisaged a roundtable
between political parties and the eSwatini government that would result in the
handover of power to an interim political authority which would in turn conduct
multi-party elections.
The government pulled many stops to sell their
approach to the global community. Addressing the United Nations General
Assembly on 21 September 2021 eSwatini Prime Minister Cleopas Dlamini said, “Our
country is committed to a process of consultation with the people at the
people’s parliament, Sibaya, and other dialogue forums through which people
provide advice and counsel to the King that ensures transparency and accountability.
As a nation we shall remain seized with the preservation of our cultural norms
and traditions, promoting peace and stability, addressing our different
opinions in a peaceful manner, not by violence”.
Continuing in its rejection of Sibaya, the prodemocracy
movement convened a conference in November 2021 in Johannesburg, South Africa.
In the conference they debated and produced proposed political dialogue terms
of reference and submitted same to SADC. In May 2022 the SADC, in line with commitments made during
the Cyril Ramaphosa visit, served the eSwatini government with proposed terms
of reference to get the ball rolling towards the political dialogue.
In the aftermath of these events the eSwatini
government appears to be taking a hard-line stance that risk isolating them
globally. Recently the Government of Eswatini spokesperson Alpheos Nxumalo
commented to a local newspaper that the government will not entertain any pressure
from any state or institutions to hold dialogue. He added that they would
convene political dialogue under their own terms without any regard to any
pressure from any institution and or country. Possibly a push back to SADC as
reliable sources have revealed that the SADC proposed terms of reference also
reject Sibaya as the proper forum.
In the meantime the situation on the ground is
tethering towards a full blown civil war. For instance there have been sporadic
burning of properties of state as well as private companies that are allegedly linked
to the eSwatini state. Personal properties of several prodemocracy movement leaders including
Wandile Dludlu and Penuel Malinga of PUDEMO,
Wander Mkhonza of the Secretary General of the trade union, the Amalgamated Trade
Union of Swaziland (ATUSWA) ,several night raids as well as harassment to
prodemocracy activists. The president of the Swaziland National Union of
Students (SNUS) Colani Maseko also suffered life threatening injuries after
being abducted and assaulted by the eSwatini Army while attending a student
protest at the University of eSwatini.
SADC has convened a special summit in Pretoria,
South Africa on 21 July 2022 in which the eSwatini political stalemate is one
of the main agenda items. The outcomes of that summit will be an important
indication as to the possibility of the resolution and ushering in of a new
political dispensation in eSwatini.
Comments
Post a Comment