Skip to main content

SUMMARY OF MENZI NKOMO VS SNA LEADERSHIP

THE MENZI NKOMO VERSUS SWAZILAND NURSES ASSOCIATION (SWADNU)  NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND OR NATIONAL OFFICE BEAERS COURT RULING 

Menzi Nkomo (SNA Member) (Above)
VS
SNA National Office bearers (Below)

                                                                                Courtesy Pictures

The ruling in the case between SNA and Menzi Nkomo was issued by the Industrial Court Judge N. Nkonyane ,sitting with S. Mvubu and G. Ginindza ,on the 31 March 2021. 


BRIEFLY ABOUT THE CASE
  
In 2019 Menzi Nkomo,a nurse stationed at Nkwene Clinic from Shiselweni region, took the leadership of the SNA to the Industrial Court because he was aggrieved that the leadership of the union was not adhering to the constitution where it comes to constitutional meetings of the union ,in particular ,the National General Council and the General Congress. Nkomo further alleged that the NEC of SNA was "was neglecting, refusing and or failing to follow the provisions of the constitution".
Comrade Nkomo's application sought to the court to the following;
  • Interdicting SNA  or anyone acting on their behalf from instituting disciplinary action against him or any other member  for launching the court process.
  • Setting aside constitutional amendments adopted by the NGC that was held on 18th March 2016.
  • Declaring the stay of the National Office Beares (NOBs) of SNA in office illegal.
  • Setting aside the SNA's decision to schedule a congress on 22-24th October 2020.
  • Directing SNA to hold the congress during a month of September as stipulated in its constitution.
  • Ordering SNA to urgently convene an urgent NGC to deliberate on congress logistics including the issue of delegates.
  • Setting aside the SNA's decision to allocate representation of delegates for all SNA branches in the congress  according to membership proportion and directing SNA to allow equal representation in the upcoming congress.
In response SNA filed their replying affidavit citing lack of urgency, doctrine of acquiescence/peremption. material non - disclosure and material dispute of facts (Courts own language).

Both parties agreed to oral evidence being led in court.
To this end a total of five witnesses were presented in court. On behalf of Cde Nkomo three witnesses were presented namely, Himself Menzi Nkomo, Thulani Mngometulu and Nelsiwe Jele. Meanwhile on behalf the  SNA NOBs witnesses were President Bheki Mamba and Wander Mkhonza (the Secretary general of ATUSWA and a guest of the 2016 General Congress).



                         Images from one of the previous SWADNU Congresses L),SNA members following court proceedings in one of their maters against the Government (R). (Courtesy Pictures)

THE JUDGEMENT

Summarily the court ruled as follows:
  • Declared that the valid constitution of SNA was the one adopted in 2011.
  • Declared that the NOBs are in office illegally, after they failed to hold a General Congress on September 2019,as stipulated by the SNA Constitution.
  • Set aside the constitutional amendments made at the NGC that was held on 18th march 2016.
  • Set aside proportional representation at the congress. Instead clause 13.1.6 of the constitution was cited which provided that ,"There shall be equal representation of regional delegates at the General Congress".
  • That the General Congress must be held within two weeks to elect NOBs and to discuss any other union business. The court further suggested that if the union wants to hold their congress early than September 2021,this congress could be in a form of an Extra Ordinary Congress since the union constitution stipulates that the regular General Congress can only be held in the month of September. The Extra ordinary Congress has the same powers as the General Congress.
  • Further, given that the country is still under strict COVID-19 regulations ,the congress can only be held upon the acquisition of a permit from the proper authorities.
  • That applicant Nkomo be granted costs of the case because all SNA members stand to benefit from his court petition.
All eyes are now on the SNA's NEC/NOBs.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NAPSAWU HAS SUSPENDED THREE NATIONAL OFFICE BEARERS

Written by Staff Reporter The National Public Service and Allied Workers Union (NAPSAWU) National General Council (NGC) ,on Thursday 15 th February 2024, suspended three of its National Office Bearers (NOBs), two of whom are believed to be principal officers. Principal Officers number up to three in trade unions and are the President, General Secretary and the Treasurer. The suspension of two of them may therefore demonstrate the seriousness of the matter just barely six months since the current NOBS took office in August 2023. The suspension of the trio is reported to have come after it had been discovered that they were one way or another involved in alleged misappropriation of undisclosed NAPSAWU funds believed to  amounting to more than one hundred thousand and seventy thousands (more than E170 000) emalangeni. The funds according to reliable sources are believed to have been approved funds for union activities but were later discovered to have been diverted into pers...

The history of Swaziland Labour Law

1.    THE HISTRORY OF SWAZI LABOUR LAW – BY NATHI GUMEDE It is difficult to proceed with issues of individual and collective Swazi Labour law without outlining the key events in the history of the Swazi Labour Movement. Though by no means comprehensive and very accurate, here are some events that have shaped Swazi Labour Law. 1937 – Wages Determining Proclamation 1947 – Trade Union Dispute Proclamation No 31 of 1942 1960 – F.C. Catchpole Commission on Labour Relations Socialization reports absence of trade unions 1962 – Pulp and Timber Worker’s Union established with Pan-Africanist influence as the first trade union; the union called the first strike the same year 1963 - Second Strike of the Pulp and Timber Worker’s Union spread into a National Strike (66,000 man hours). The National strike led to the formation of the Swaziland Democratic party and the Swaziland Progressive Party. The strike was thwarted by the First Battalion of Gordon Highlands from Ken...

OPINION: PRIME MINISTER RUSSELL DLAMINI VS AUDITOR GENERAL TIMOTHY MATSEBULA

  Eswatini Prime Minister Russell Dlamini (L) and Auditor General Timothy Matsebula (R) during their meeting in the cabinet offices in March 2024. (Picture courtesy of Eswatini government social media platform) Written by Fundizwi Sikhondze Prime Minister Russell Mmiso Dlamini on Thursday 6th June 2024 may have single-handedly plunged his government into its first major political crisis.  While fielding questions from the country's editors the Prime Minister was asked a question by  The Nation Magazine's Bheki Makhubu about  the audit reports from the Auditor General (AG) regarding his tenure as the Chief Executive Officer of the National Disaster Management Agency (NDMA). The audits had allegedly flagged unaccounted for expenditure of E180M worth of funds and lately there a report which questioned expenditure of E30M from the NDMA.     Prime Minister's reply left his audience of journalist and cabinet ministers gasping as perhaps none were ready for i...