Skip to main content

NEALS BUDGET FAILED TO EFFECT DISTRIBUTIVE EXPENDITURE IN ORDER TO ERADICATE INEQUALITY MADE WORSE BY COVID-19.

 

Budget failed to effect distributive expenditure and instead continued the trickle down dream.

By Fundizwi Sikhondze

 

Inequality (Source: Online)

The budget speech read by Finance Minister Neal Rijkernberg on 26th February 2021 demonstrated once more what many have always feared around the country, that the government, made up of mainly business operatives continues not doing much to balance the economic imbalances that afflict the Eswatini society. The Minister of Finance instead chose to continue down the beaten path of trickle-down economics.

The trickle-down economics doctrine basically entrusts the private sector with correcting societal challenges that include poverty reduction and unemployment reduction. In reality however the markets are never perfect and thus may not give the expected result as any given moment. For instance, where companies are supposed to hire more people to undertake certain services, they can delay and not do the same, continue to use the current workforce if when their profit margins improve.

This is primarily why trickle-down economics has been synonymous with gross inequality globally because often the government has very little power to intervene in order to resolve imbalances in the economic system.

Poverty and Inequality, particularly brought by the COVID-19, has rendered urgent the need for intervention in order to improve the conditions of the poor and those who are suffering as a result of not having livelihoods because of COVID-19. The number of those adversely affected by the economy keep growing by the day. Sunday newspapers (28/02/21) have reported that the Happy Valley Hotel, in Ezulwini was retrenching around 76 employees. These are the people going back to communities and who shall have not have any income going forward.

 

 

 

 

 

Finance Minister Neal Rikjinberg (Source:www.observer.co.sz)

Unfortunately, Neal and his almost E24 Billion budget again failed to rise to the occasion. While they seem to have responded to calls to increase the existing grants by increasing the budget for the Old Age Grant and the Disability Gran. The budget, however, did not provide for the addition of all possible beneficiaries namely those who are living in poverty and have been driven to poverty by the COVID-19 economy

One distribution mechanism that would have been momentous to employ would have been the Basic Income Grant (BIG).

In one of its policy proposals in 2020 the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) had advised countries to consider implementing BIG in order to assist vulnerable people to cope with effects of COVID-19. The UNDP had suggested to governments that even if these measure were put up temporarily it would be helpful to citizens in need. The IMF and World Bank had been studying the effects of distributive expenditure on inequality and found that there was correlation between distributive government expenditure and reduction of inequality. The countries with the most equality in their socio economic systems including Nordic countries such as Norway and Sweden have a high distributive expenditure of more than 25% and above.

Given this reality, it is expected that inequality shall deepen in the country.

Comments

  1. We are in for a high jump with these financial woes. The government of Swaziland is the least bothered to bridge the inequality gap. The poor are ostracized by the negligence suffered where budgetary measures are concerned. It is quite worrying. There is no hope, capital projects are sucking out the marrow; yet making no attempts in providing hope for a resuscitated economy. Closure or retrenchment of workers in the hospitality industry yet billions are splashed on the ICC and Fish project- one of choice, leaves a lot to be desired. What is the use of such a structure which had been under construction for close to a decade? Why such exorbitant skip from initial budget. Who looks into the proper utilisation of funding for these capital projects? Is the government even worried about the implications of such expenditures? Why are investigations of inquiry for these spendings not instituted?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NAPSAWU HAS SUSPENDED THREE NATIONAL OFFICE BEARERS

Written by Staff Reporter The National Public Service and Allied Workers Union (NAPSAWU) National General Council (NGC) ,on Thursday 15 th February 2024, suspended three of its National Office Bearers (NOBs), two of whom are believed to be principal officers. Principal Officers number up to three in trade unions and are the President, General Secretary and the Treasurer. The suspension of two of them may therefore demonstrate the seriousness of the matter just barely six months since the current NOBS took office in August 2023. The suspension of the trio is reported to have come after it had been discovered that they were one way or another involved in alleged misappropriation of undisclosed NAPSAWU funds believed to  amounting to more than one hundred thousand and seventy thousands (more than E170 000) emalangeni. The funds according to reliable sources are believed to have been approved funds for union activities but were later discovered to have been diverted into pers...

The history of Swaziland Labour Law

1.    THE HISTRORY OF SWAZI LABOUR LAW – BY NATHI GUMEDE It is difficult to proceed with issues of individual and collective Swazi Labour law without outlining the key events in the history of the Swazi Labour Movement. Though by no means comprehensive and very accurate, here are some events that have shaped Swazi Labour Law. 1937 – Wages Determining Proclamation 1947 – Trade Union Dispute Proclamation No 31 of 1942 1960 – F.C. Catchpole Commission on Labour Relations Socialization reports absence of trade unions 1962 – Pulp and Timber Worker’s Union established with Pan-Africanist influence as the first trade union; the union called the first strike the same year 1963 - Second Strike of the Pulp and Timber Worker’s Union spread into a National Strike (66,000 man hours). The National strike led to the formation of the Swaziland Democratic party and the Swaziland Progressive Party. The strike was thwarted by the First Battalion of Gordon Highlands from Ken...

OPINION: PRIME MINISTER RUSSELL DLAMINI VS AUDITOR GENERAL TIMOTHY MATSEBULA

  Eswatini Prime Minister Russell Dlamini (L) and Auditor General Timothy Matsebula (R) during their meeting in the cabinet offices in March 2024. (Picture courtesy of Eswatini government social media platform) Written by Fundizwi Sikhondze Prime Minister Russell Mmiso Dlamini on Thursday 6th June 2024 may have single-handedly plunged his government into its first major political crisis.  While fielding questions from the country's editors the Prime Minister was asked a question by  The Nation Magazine's Bheki Makhubu about  the audit reports from the Auditor General (AG) regarding his tenure as the Chief Executive Officer of the National Disaster Management Agency (NDMA). The audits had allegedly flagged unaccounted for expenditure of E180M worth of funds and lately there a report which questioned expenditure of E30M from the NDMA.     Prime Minister's reply left his audience of journalist and cabinet ministers gasping as perhaps none were ready for i...